Which design was utilized in the research conducted by Nelissen et al. (2017)?

The research conducted by Nelissen et al. (2017) employed a quantitative design, which is characterized by the collection and analysis of numerical data to identify patterns, relationships, or trends. In quantitative research, the aim is often to test hypotheses or to provide a statistical analysis that can be generalized to a larger population. This approach typically involves the use of surveys, experiments, or structured observations, allowing for data that can be measured and compared objectively.

In this context, a quantitative design is appropriate for studies seeking to draw conclusions that can be statistically validated, which aligns with the methods commonly used by Nelissen et al. Such studies often rely on measurable variables and statistical techniques to derive insights from the data collected, making them suitable for rigorous scientific investigation.

Other research designs like qualitative or mixed methods would focus more on descriptive, narrative, or flexible approaches that gather data based on subjective assessments rather than statistical analysis. In contrast, a case study design would involve an in-depth exploration of one or a few instances, which is not representative of the broader, numerical focus of quantitative research.