Which of the following contributes to the body of knowledge during a literature review?

During a literature review, identifying researchers who contribute to the field is vital for several reasons. These researchers are often foundational figures whose work has significantly informed the current understanding of a topic. By noting their contributions, one gains insight into the evolution of theories, methodologies, and findings within that domain. This awareness helps to contextualize new research and understand how it fits into or challenges existing knowledge.

Highlighting influential researchers also aids in recognizing trends, predominant frameworks, and debates within the field. This knowledge enhances the quality of the literature review, enabling it to showcase not just individual studies but also the broader scholarly discourse.

While identifying popular journals can guide where to find credible sources, and researching specific effects (like social media) can provide relevant content, understanding the contributions of key researchers offers a more comprehensive perspective on the field's development and current state. Gathering anecdotal evidence, although useful in certain contexts, generally does not contribute to the rigorous scholarly dialogue that a literature review aims to cultivate.